Friday, 8 October 2010

DYMM Tuanku Sultan Johor Speech on 4 Oct 2010...A timely reminder for all Malaysians

The DYMM Tuanku Sultan Johor delivered a speech recently on 4 October 2010 during the opening of "Seminar Perlembagaan Malaysia Peringkat Negeri Johor". 


Among others, the speech was a timely reminder to us all not to debate on sensitive issues already enshrined in the Perlembagaan (Our Constitution) and also reminding the Judiciary to be extra careful when dealing with sensitive cases especially those which involved the powers of the Monarchy. Read the full text, obtained from Malaysia-Instinct:


"SEBAGAIMANA yang kita ketahui, Perlembagaan Persekutuan adalah undang-undang yang paling utama di Malaysia. Ia merupakan sebuah Perlembagaan yang lengkap dan telah mengambil kira kepentingan semua rakyat dan latar belakang sejarah negara ini.

Perlembagaan ini telah digubal dengan begitu teliti oleh Suruhanjaya Reid yang dianggotai oleh pakar-pakar undang-undang dari luar negara. Ia telah melalui pelbagai proses yang rumit, termasuklah meneliti 131 memorandum dari semua pihak dan mengadakan 118 persidangan dalam masa lima bulan.
Seterusnya, Rang Perlembagaan Persekutuan Tanah Melayu telah melalui proses maklum balas, kajian semula, pindaan dan akhirnya barulah diluluskan oleh Majlis Undangan Persekutuan pada 15 Ogos 1957 dan seterusnya berkuat kuasa pada 27 Ogos 1957.
Kita mesti faham bahawa Perlembagaan ini telah digubal bersandarkan kepada semangat toleransi oleh semua pihak untuk mencapai kemerdekaan. Oleh yang demikian, semua aspek agama, bangsa, budaya dan bahasa telah diambil kira dengan adil dan saksama untuk mewujudkan sebuah negara Malaysia yang aman dan damai.
Yang paling jelas adalah semangat toleransi dalam Parti Perikatan di mana MCA dan MIC telah bersetuju menerima kedudukan “hak istimewa orang Melayu’’ dan Bahasa Melayu sebagai Bahasa Kebangsaan. Manakala pihak UMNO pula telah bersetuju menerima pemberian taraf kerakyatan kepada orang-orang asing secara jus soli.
Kita perlu ingat bahawa Perlembagaan Persekutuan ini bukan digubal dengan sewenang-wenangnya. Orang dahulu telah berfikir dengan mendalam dan berpandangan jauh tentang masa hadapan.
Oleh itu pada masa kini janganlah mudah sangat demi untuk kepentingan sesuatu pihak, Perlembagaan ini dipinda sesuka hati. Kerana akhirnya nanti Perlembagaan ini akan menjadi tidak bermakna dan mungkin tinggal sekeping kertas sahaja.
Di dalam seminar ini nanti, saudara saudari telitilah berapa banyak pindaan yang telah dibuat terhadap Perlembagaan ini dan sebab-sebab mengapa pindaan itu dibuat.
Dokumen asas kepada Perlembagaan Persekutuan adalah Perjanjian Persekutuan Tanah Melayu 1948 yang ditandatangani oleh pihak British dengan Raja-Raja Melayu. Di mana Raja-Raja Melayu telah bersetuju melepaskan sedikit kuasa pemerintahannya di negeri-negeri. Namun begitu kuasa Raja-Raja terhadap agama dan adat istiadat Melayu masih dikekalkan dan dinyatakan dengan jelas.
Begitu juga di dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan, kuasa Yang di-Pertuan Agong dan Raja-Raja juga dinyatakan dengan jelas sebagai payung kepada negara dan negeri. Namun begitu ada juga pihak yang semasa senang, lupa akan pentingnya Institusi Diraja dan cuba menghapuskan kuasa Raja-Raja.
Tetapi malangnya, apabila timbul masalah di kemudian hari, mulalah mencari Raja untuk meminta bantuan dan perlindungan. Inilah sikap manusia yang lupa diri. Semasa hari redup, payung dicampak dan dibuang, tetapi bila hujan turun, masing-masing berlari mencari payung untuk berlindung.
Negeri Johor merupakan Negeri Tanah Melayu yang pertama mempunyai Undang-Undang Tubuh Kerajaannya sendiri iaitu pada tahun 1895. Undang-undang ini mengambil masa 10 tahun untuk dibuat dan menjadi asas kepada undang-undang tubuh negeri lain dan juga Perlembagaan Persekutuan.
Di dalam Perjanjian Persekutuan juga, Raja-Raja Melayu telah berkorban dan bersetuju untuk menyerahkan sebahagian kuasa mutlaknya terhadap negeri bagi membentuk persekutuan yang merdeka. Ini bermakna, jika tidak ada negeri, tidak akan ada persekutuan.
Sehubungan dengan itu, pihak Persekutuan mestilah peka dengan apa yang hendak dilaksanakan di negeri-negeri. Walaupun hubungan hal ehwal luar negara adalah di bawah kuasa Persekutuan, tetapi sekiranya perjanjian yang hendak dibuat melibatkan tanah dan kepentingan negeri, rujuklah dahulu perkara tersebut kepada Raja negeri yang berkenaan.
Keharmonian rakyat Malaysia yang berbilang bangsa dan agama telah menjadi contoh kepada negara-negara lain. Ini semua telah dapat dicapai dengan adanya semangat bertolak ansur dan hormat-menghormati antara semua bangsa dan agama di negara ini.
Namun begitu akhir-akhir ini, ada pihak yang begitu ghairah memperjuangkan kaumnya dan mempertikaikan hak dan keistimewaan orang Melayu yang telah diperuntukkan sekian lama di dalam Perlembagaan.
Mereka ini adalah golongan yang cetek akal dan hanya bercakap mengikut selera sendiri tanpa meneliti sejarah pembentukan Perlembagaan Persekutuan. Tindakan ini akan hanya merosakkan keharmonian hubungan kaum dan kesejahteraan hidup masyarakat negara ini.
Kita perlu ingat, keistimewaan yang diberikan kepada orang Melayu tidak menghalang hak kaum lain, malah kaum lain juga diberi hak dan jaminan di dalam Perlembagaan. Ini semua terbentuk hasil dari sikap toleransi yang tinggi pemimpin-pemimpin kita dahulu.
Keharmonian negara ini mestilah dijaga dengan baik dan janganlah dibahaskan isu-isu sensitif yang boleh menggugat kesejahteraan negara. Jangan dipersoalkan kuasa Raja di dalam Perlembagaan atau Enakmen Negeri kerana itu bukanlah hak untuk dibahaskan.
Jangan tafsir Perlembagaan mengikut selera dan kepentingan sendiri dan tidak perlu mengajar Raja mengenai undang-undang dan kuasa kerana Raja telah dididik tentang kuasa sejak kecil lagi.
Belajarlah daripada peristiwa 13 Mei 1969, yang mana kedamaian negara tergadai akibat daripada hilangnya sikap toleransi dan wujudnya golongan pelampau atau extremist.
Di mana-mana juga, golongan extremist inilah yang menjadi dalang merosakkan kedamaian sesebuah negara. Oleh itu, kita harus bersikap sederhana dan bertolak ansur jika kita ingin hidup makmur dalam negara yang berbilang bangsa ini.
Apa yang lebih penting sekarang adalah untuk kita sama-sama berganding bahu, bersatu padu dan berusaha bersungguh-sungguh untuk membangunkan negara kita untuk menjadi sebuah negara yang maju.
Di sini juga, suka saya ingatkan kepada semua pelaksana dan pengamal undang-undang supaya mengambil tindakan selaras dengan Perlembagaan Persekutuan. Pihak mahkamah atau badan kehakiman juga perlu lebih berhati-hati apabila menerima sesuatu kes untuk diadili.
Kes-kes sensitif yang tidak sesuai untuk dibicarakan hendaklah ditolak kerana jika mahkamah mendengar kes tersebut dan membuat keputusan, sudah pasti ada pihak yang tidak berpuas hati. Oleh itu, adalah lebih baik jangan dilayan atau ditolak kes-kes yang sensitif terutamanya yang melibatkan kuasa Raja-Raja.
Sebarang bentuk perbahasan dan pertelingkahan mengenai isu-isu sensitif juga hendaklah dielakkan kerana ia hanya akan menambahkan lagi jurang perselisihan terutama antara agama dan bangsa.
Segala kekeliruan yang timbul pula perlu diperjelaskan dengan teliti supaya semua rakyat dalam negara ini dapat hidup dengan harmoni, aman damai, dan saling hormat menghormati bagi menjamin ketenteraman dan kesejahteraan hidup semua.
Penganjuran seminar seperti ini hendaklah dilakukan secara berterusan dan diperluaskan ke segenap lapisan masyarakat, terutama kepada generasi muda masa kini.
Saya percaya, sekiranya mereka faham dengan maksud-maksud yang terkandung di dalam Perlembagaan ini dan memahami asas dan sejarahnya, sudah pasti mereka akan sedar betapa beruntungnya mereka hidup di zaman kemerdekaan.
Kepada pembuat dan pelaksana dasar, gunakanlah kesempatan ini untuk mendapatkan kefahaman yang jelas agar segala keputusan dan tindakan yang diambil selari dengan peruntukan-peruntukan yang terdapat di dalam Perlembagaan Persekutuan.
Saya juga berharap agar saudara saudari yang menghadiri seminar ini dapat mendalami dan memahami Perlembagaan yang ada seterusnya menjelaskan mengenainya kepada masyarakat umum. Berpeganglah kepada Perlembagaan yang ada dan yang paling mudah ingatlah Rukun Negara yang sering kita ikrarkan.
Akhir kata dengan lafaz Bismillahir Rahmanirrahim, saya dengan sukacitanya merasmikan Seminar Perlembagaan Malaysia Peringkat Negeri Johor pada hari yang mulia ini."
Here are reports from the MSM on the speech:

Utusan: Patuhi peringatan Sultan Johor, jangan cabar Perlembagaan,


New Straits Times: 'Treat sensitive cases cautiously',


TheStar: Johor Sultan: Don’t trifle with Constitution.


...and for another reminder here is our  RUKUN NEGARA :

Maka kami rakyat Malaysia berikrar akan menumpukan seluruh tenaga dan usaha kami untuk mencapai cita-cita tersebut berdasarkan atas prinsip-prinsip yang berikut: 

1. Kepercayaan kepada Tuhan 

2. Kesetiaan kepada Raja dan Negara 

3. Keluhuran Perlembagaan 

4. Kedaulatan Undang-Undang 

5. Kesopanan dan Kesusilaan 

DAULAT TUANKU, DAULAT TUANKU, DAULAT TUANKU.

Just an Interlude..The Irish millionaire

Interlude...an email from a friend, enjoy...

The Irish Millionaire 

Mick, from  Dublin  ,appeared on
'Who Wants To Be A Millionaire'
and towards the end of the program
had already won 500,000 pounds.

"You've done very well so far," said Chris Tarrant,the show's presenter, "but for a million pounds you've only got one life-line left – phone a friend. 

Everything is riding on this question.....will you go for it?"

"Sure," said Mick. "I'll have a go!"

"Which of the following birds does NOT build its own nest?

a) Sparrow


b) Thrush,

c) Magpie,

d) Cuckoo"

 

"I haven't got a clue." said Mick, so I'll use last lifeline and phone my friend
Paddy back home in  Dublin." 

Mick called up his mate, and told him the circumstances and
repeated the question to him. 

"Fookin hell, Mick!" cried Paddy. "Dat's simple......

It's a cuckoo."

"Are you sure?" 
"I'm fookin sure." 

Mick hung up the phone and told Chris,

"I'll go wit Cuckoo as my answer."

"Is that your final answer?" asked Chris.

"Dat it is, Sir"

There was a long - long pause, and then the presenter screamed,

"Cuckoo is the correct answer!
 Mick, you've won 1 million pounds!"

The next night,
Mick invited Paddy to their local pub to buy him a drink.


"Tell me, Paddy? How in Heaven's name did you know it was da Cuckoo that doesn't build its own nest?"
Paddy said ,
"Because he lives in a Fookin clock!"

Wednesday, 6 October 2010

MasyaALLAH...Sodomy 2 part (a)?

Update: Please see Tuan Syed's take on this interesting issue, somebody's going to get burnt real bad this time when the police starts their investigation, read here.


Original Post:


MasyaALLAH, Oh My God, this is unbelievable...


Anwar's ex-aide lodges police report alleging 2008 SDs "inaccurate"
DARSHINI KANDASAMY
ALFIAN TAHIR
Wednesday, October 6th, 2010 19:23:00(The Malay Mail)


KLANG: A former aide of Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim has lodged a police report over two allegedly "inaccurate" statutory declarations (SD) he was supposedly forced to make two years ago implicating the Prime Minister and his wife.


Rahimi Osman said he lodged the report at 2pm today at the Klang district police headquarters pertaining to two statutory declarations he made in 2008.


In the report, Rahimi alleged he was forced to sign the two SDs, which were related to the ongoing Sodomy II trial involving the Pakatan Rakyat defacto leader and another of the latter's ex-aide, Saiful Bukhari Azlan, on June 28, 2008.


It was claimed Rahimi was pressured into implicating Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and his wife Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor of masterminding a conspiracy against Anwar.


Soon after the report was lodged this afternoon, Rahimi, accompanied by several men, conducted a press conference at a nearby restaurant.


However, upon speaking to the press, Rahimi was stopped by several unknown men believed to be the members of Parti Keadilan Rakyat (PKR).


The press conference was cut short as the situation worsened with both parties seen exchanging words.


Rahimi, believed to be Saiful's former schoolmate, then left the restaurant and it was reported in a blog that he would conduct another press conference in Petaling Jaya but the exact time and location of the new press conference were unknown.


When contacted by The Malay Mail, Klang district police chief ACP Mohamad Mat Yusof confirmed a report was lodged late this afternoon.


He declined to elaborate any further on the content of the report except to say the matter had been transferred to the Shah Alam district police.


It was, however, reported in an online news portal that Rahimi had claimed he was forced to sign the two SDs by PKR information chief Latheefa Koya and other party members at a hotel as he feared for his safety and was forced to stay at the hotel for a few days after signing the SDs.


The news portal also quoted Anwar's lead counsel Sankara Nair who refuted the ex-aide’s claims.


Sankara claimed Rahimi had signed the two declarations voluntarily after a meeting with Anwar’s lawyers at the hotel that day.

read more here.

The report above also mentioned the possibility that Latheefa Koya was involved in forcing Rahimi to sign the two  purportedly "inaccurate" SD's in 2008, I understand she is a practising Lawyer, therefore, beside Anwar Ibrahim, I think she should also come out tonight or tomorrow at the latest to deny what is a very grave allegation against her and the other PKR members.

American Leaders DO NOT know why they are at war in Afghanistan?

Thought provoking article by the American Washington Examiner's Columnist , Gene Healy where he wrote:


Gene Healy: Not even our leaders know why we are in Afghanistan

By: GENE HEALY 
Examiner Columnist
October 4, 2010

It's Bob Woodward season again in Washington, D.C., as the Watergate scribe's latest tome dominates Borders' display racks like the skulls and pumpkins at your local CVS.
"Obama's Wars" is mostly about President Obama's war: Afghanistan, where he's nearly tripled deployments in the ever-enduring Operation Enduring Freedom. Woodward's book hit the shelves as coalition losses passed 550 this year, making 2010 the deadliest yet.
You don't need Woodward's connections to figure out that the Afghan War is a hideous, unwinnable, unnecessary mess. But the Post reporter's stenographic, fly-on-the-wall account of key meetings bolsters the case that the Obama administration should have recognized that from the start.
"We haven't really seen an Arab here in a couple of years," the Afghan theater commander admitted to Vice President Biden early on. Nor was there much reason to believe that the Taliban would risk providing al Qaeda a safe haven if the U.S. left.
Nevertheless, the military brass pushed hard for more troops. We'd have to provide security while we built a government Afghans could trust — and we might only have a year to do it. Unfortunately, the existing government was "a criminal syndicate," Gen. David Petraeus admitted at a meeting in October 2009. Biden, of all people, asked the pertinent question: "If the government's a 'criminal syndicate' a year from now, how will troops make a difference?"
"No one recorded an answer," Woodward reports.
If we leave too soon, though, Obama warned in early 2009, we'd see "denial of human rights to the Afghan people, especially women and girls."
That's what Time Magazine suggested last July, with a gruesome cover photograph of a teenage girl who'd had her nose sliced off by the Taliban. "What Happens if We Leave Afghanistan" the caption read — no question mark.
Yet that brutal crime happened while we stayed, as did August's execution of a young couple from Kunduz province who had eloped against their parents' wishes. "Hundreds of men, stones in hand, closed in to carry out the mullah's death sentence," the Los Angeles Times reported.
Woodward's book reveals that Afghan President Hamid Karzai is a manic depressive with "severe mood swings." Looking at the country Karzai purports to govern, though, maybe he's just a realist.
Then again, maybe what Afghanistan needs is just a good, taxpayer-funded, pro-democracy kite festival. That's a winning proposition if you're bucking for a U.S. Agency for International Development grant these days.
Two weeks ago, a USAID contractor gave it a try, passing out "justice-themed comic books" and kites with logos celebrating women's equality to a couple hundred children in Kabul. "The mere portrait of 500 kites soaring in the winds, against a backdrop of beautiful mountain ranges, is enough to instill hope in even the most disheartened observer of the war-torn country," read the press release.
Unfortunately, the New York Times reported, "Afghan policemen hijacked the event, stealing dozens of kites for themselves and beating children with sticks when they crowded too close." The cops even stole the comic books, but most of them are illiterate, so they ended up just "tossing piles of them in the dirt."
Last October, Woodward reports, National Security Adviser James Jones called an emergency meeting with Defense Secretary Robert Gates and Secretary of State Hillary Clinton. "The president was not happy": After countless meetings and dueling memoranda, "they had not found a way to articulate why the United States was in Afghanistan. What were America's interests?"
It was a good question then. A year and several hundred fallen soldiers later, it's still a good question.
Examiner Columnist Gene Healy is a vice president at the Cato Institute and the author of "The Cult of the Presidency."
Read more of the article by Mr Healy here.

Malaysian Leaders are not cruel as to actually cut off water supply life line to the city state

From reports that appeared in the MI on the eulogy delivered by Singapore Minister Mentor for his late wife, among others Mr Lee Kuan Yew touched on the relationship between Malaysian leaders and the city state, apparently portraying Malaysian leaders and the dominant political party in negative light.


If the report is true, then I think Malaysian Leaders deserve better than that, as we Malaysians believed in prosper thy neighbor and definitely no Malaysian Leaders will resort to order physically cutting of water supply life line to the little city state, that would be inhumane. (though they may be tempted to during the times that Lee Kuan Yew was PM of Singapore) 


The MI Report:


LKY says wife made sure Malaysia could not cut off water supply

October 06, 2010
KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 6 — Singapore’s minister mentor Lee Kuan Yew delivered a eulogy today to his wife Kwa Geok Choo and credited her with safeguarding the republic’s interest “each time Malaysian Malay leaders threatened to cut off our water supply.”
He also revealed that Kwa, who died on Saturday in Singapore, had cautioned him against joining the Malaysian federation, because the politics of Umno’s Malay leaders were “communally-based, on race and religion.”
Lee was speaking at Kwa’s private funeral service today at Singapore’s Mandai crematorium where the couple’s family and friends had gathered to pay their final respects to the 89-year-old.
In his eulogy which drew tears all around, Lee took time to fondly recall how his wife’s quiet defiance and unrelenting support had influenced him in many of his decisions in their 63 years together.
It was Kwa, he said, who had been instrumental in ensuring that the Malaysian government would stick to its guarantee to observe two water agreements, signed back in 1961 and 1962, when the city state was forced to leave the Federation of Malaya in 1963.
“When separation was imminent, Eddie Barker, as Law Minister, drew up the draft legislation for the separation. But he did not include an undertaking by the Federation Government to guarantee the observance of the two water agreements between the PUB (Public Utilities Board) and the Johor state government.
“I asked Choo (Kwa) to include this,” he explained.
Kwa, added Lee, was “meticulous in her choice of words”.
“The amendment statute was annexed to the Separation Agreement, which we then registered with the United Nations.
“The then Commonwealth Secretary Arthur Bottomley said that if other federations were to separate, he hoped they would do it as professionally as Singapore and Malaysia,” he continued.
Lee proudly said that Bottomley’s words were a compliment to both Barker and his wife’s professional skills.
“[Now] each time Malaysian Malay leaders threatened to cut off our water supply, I was reassured that this clear and solemn international undertaking by the Malaysian government in its Constitution will get us a ruling by the UNSC (United Nations Security Council),” he said.
Kwa, he pointed out, had also been spot-on in her foresight that a Malaysia-Singapore union would not work.
“When we were about to join Malaysia, she told me that we would not succeed because the Umno Malay leaders had such different lifestyles and because their politics were communally-based, on race and religion,” he said.
At the time, however, Lee recalled, he had told his wife that the union had to work for want of a better choice.
Read the rest here.
We may not be as prosperous as Singapore yet, but Malaysians and their Leaders are not cruel and heartless people lah Mr Lee, give credit when it is due lah...our Malaysian Government had and will always honour the Water Agreement with the city state or whatever agreement that had been signed with other countries, that I am sure.

DAP asked...is the NEM nothing but just rhethorics

DAP Tony Pua have today come up with some strong criticism of the BN Government and questioned its commitment to competition under the "New Economic Model" citing projects seemingly being maneuvered into the hands of the usual suspects namely YTL, Gamuda, MMC(Syed Mokhtar), Assas Serba(Halim Saad) etc. 


I do not normally agree with the DAP  but this time I think they are asking the right questions, things that I think soon even the NGO Perkasa will take up as well from a different angle I am sure.


I am just wondering out loud whether the apparent likely mega awards are just trial baloons floated by PM Najib's Government to see what the reaction of the public will be, or are there are actual move towards direct negotiation of the chosen few elites? Also, has the New Economic Model been finalised anyway. Read these fantastic pieces by Dato' Sak for good measure and this one as well.


I have always said that in the name of transparency, accountability and obtaining best value for our money in constructing big/mega projects, the Government should invite Vendors/Developers which have undergone a strict PreQualification exercise so that only companies which are technically and financially qualified according to the rules and specifications set by the Malaysian Government are invited to submit proposals. Unsolicited single mega proposals should be red flagged. Additional read here.


Read the MI report here:

DAP says UEM, MRT, YTL deals show NEM ‘nothing but rhetoric’
By Melissa Chi October 06, 2010 (MI)


KUALA LUMPUR, Oct 6 — The DAP suggested today that the Najib administration’s commitment to open competition under the New Economic Model (NEM) was “nothing but rhetoric,” citing as examples of patronage the MRT project, the proposal by Asas Serba to take over highway concessions, Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary’s bid to buy UEM and YTL’s involvement in the high-speed rail link to Singapore.


“Should the government decide to proceed with any of the above projects or privatisation of assets without any form of open competition, it will not only reflect the fact that the NEM is nothing but rhetoric, but it has no sincerity in wanting to promote “dynamic and efficient markets” or isn’t serious about “tapping new sources of growth,” the Pakatan Rakyat (PR) party’s national publicity secretary Tony Pua said in a statement today.


The Malaysian Insider reported yesterday that state asset manager Khazanah Nasional Berhad is looking at tycoon Tan Sri Syed Mokhtar Al-Bukhary’s financial track record as it mulls his offer to buy the UEM Group Bhd, which runs the profitable Plus expressways concessionaire, for the amount of RM15.6 billion.


UEM has substantial stakes in 8 public listed companies, and is prized for its 38.5 per cent ownership of PLUS Expressways Bhd, 28.7 per cent of Time dotCom Bhd, 32.0 per cent of Faber Group Bhd and 77.1 per cent of UEM Land Bhd. It also owns the Penang Bridge Sdn Bhd as well as Cement Industries Malaysia Bhd. As at the end of 2009, the net assets of UEM Group Bhd amounted to RM12.3 billion.


The Malaysian Insider also reported on October 4 that Syed Mokhtar had asked the government to sell 1,200ha of Rubber Research Institute (RRI) land in Sungai Buloh and the police training centre in Jalan Semarak.


The government is now considering the award of Malaysia’s largest infrastructure project to date, that is the Greater KL Mass Rapid Transit (MRT) system which is expected to cost up to RM46 billion with a Gamuda Bhd and MMC Bhd joint venture being touted as the “winners” of the project.


“In fact Gamuda has already told equity analysts that it is 80 per cent certain of being awarded the bulk of the project, and this would be because they are the only commercial party who have been in consultation with the Government as well as Pemandu to develop the entire plan for the project. “Similarly, YTL Corporation Bhd is expected to “win” the project to develop the high-speed train service between Kuala Lumpur and Singapore due to its involvement with Pemandu at the “laboratory” stage of the ETP,” Pua said today.


Deputy Prime Minister Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin had also admitted that the Cabinet is mulling over the RM50 billion proposal by Asas Serba whom Pua claimed was linked to Tan Sri Halim Saad to take over all highway concessions in Malaysia.


Pua said the proposal should have been rejected outright for it was “completely without basis, merit and it was completely unsolicited”.


International Trade and Industry Minister Datuk Seri Mustapa Mohamed had said that getting a tender through direct negotiation is “unfair”, to Malaysian students at the University of Melbourne on October 2.


He said that only high-security projects involving the military and defence were exempted from open tender.


But the slew of government assets and projects being directly negotiated by the administration which were cited by Pua today appeared to contradict Mustapa’s assertion.


Mustapa had said in Melbourne that “open tender means more competition, greater transparency, no corruption. And that’s what the public wants. And we are listening to the public.”


Pua also pointed out that Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak had emphasised that “we can no longer tolerate practices that support the behaviour of rent-seeking and patronage.”


Read the report in full here.

PM Najib and his Cabinet ought to come clean on this matter and should explain the rationale of their decisions to the people who only wants best and equitable value in public spending. 


As the BN Government had often repeatedly said.... the era of the Government knows best is long over.

On 4 Oct 2010 the President of Germany declares that Islam is now part of Germany

Its official folks as of 4th October 2010, ISLAM is now part of GERMANY:

German president says 20 years later, Islam now part of Germany
Oct 04, 2010 by Anli Serfontein(The Christian Century)


Trier, Germany, 4 October (ENI)--Islam is part of a modern, changing Germany, the country's president, Christian Wulff, told the nation in an address on the 20th anniversary of the reunification of the once divided nation.


"Christianity is, of course, part of Germany. Judaism is, of course, part of Germany. This is our Judeo-Christian history. But, now, Islam is also part of Germany," the president told the assembled dignitaries in the northern city of Bremen, including Chancellor Angela Merkel, on 4 October.


Before his appointment as president in July 2010, Wulff, as Minister President of Lower Saxony, appointed the first Muslim state cabinet minister in Germany.


"When German Muslims write to me to tell me 'You are our president' - then I answer wholeheartedly: Yes, of course I am your president! And with the same dedication and conviction of which I am the president of all the people who live in Germany," Wulff said.


Wulff spoke about the challenges facing a multicultural Germany in times of rapid social and global changes. "Twenty years after reunification, we stand before the huge task of finding new solidarity in a Germany that is part of a swiftly changing world," he said.


For her part, Merkel, endorsed Wulff's words, but also expressed reservations with regard to the position of Islam in German culture. Merkel demanded that Muslims living in Germany also conform to "fundamental German values," saying there can be no leeway on the issue.


In recent weeks an intense debate has raged in Germany about the willingness of Muslim immigrant to integrate and learn the language. A book claiming that Turkish Muslims are not willing to integrate reached the top of the non-fiction bestseller list.


"The future belongs to those nations who are open to cultural diversity, to new ideas and who do not shy away from debating with foreigners," Wulff noted.


He also paid tribute to the role the churches played 20 years ago in enabling the peaceful revolution that led to reunification. "The churches gave a shelter to the new, courage for freedom," he said.


In the autumn of 1989 prayer meetings for peace grew from week to week, ending in mass demonstrations against the totalitarian East German state....


....About two thirds of the German population belongs to a Christian church. Before 1989, West Germany had a majority Roman Catholic population, while East Germany was predominantly Protestant. Today there are 25 million Catholics and 24 million Protestants in the country. While people of Turkish origin account for 2.4 percent of Germany's people, Muslim's account for 3.7 percent of the 82 million population.

read more here.

Tuesday, 5 October 2010

Of "wang dari hasil judi" and "wang dari cukai judi"

Lately there has been much debate of the issue of using gambling money by the DAP led state Government to use as direct gift to the poor in Pulau Pinang. read here, here.


I do not want to discuss the merits of politicians questioning the act of other rival politicians giving out money to the poor. To me it is simply this..if a state or federal Government wants to give you money because you qualify to be given Aid, just take it and let the State or Federal Government worries about the halal or the haram part where the money comes from. No other party should get involved in what is a private affair between the giver(Government) and the receiver(poor in need), worse if some politicians plays the pious role and starts to meddle in the affair and questioning the source of the money, then all hell can break loose read here, and here.


Using religion for political purposes most of the time backfires and this serves a lesson for UMNO or any other parties. Even though some UMNO supporters tried to say there is a difference between "hasil dari keuntungan judi" and "hasil dari cukai judi", I do not think it cuts ice especially with many Malaysians who are non Muslims.


Surprisingly there is an article from Harakah Online which might let us see the light at the end of the tunnel:

Hukum menerima wang sumber tidak jelas


Zaharuddin Abd Rahman


Tindakan penerima wang bantuan kerajaan Pulau Pinang memulangkan kembali wang tersebut boleh dinilai dari dua sudut iaitu sudut politik dan sudut agama atau hukum. Saya tidak berhasrat menyentuh isu terbabit dari sudut politik kerana ia bukan bidang saya. Cuma jika, tindakan tersebut jika dijadikan ikutan, nanti kita akan dapat melihat kebanyakan orang miskin di Malaysia memulangkan wang bantuan yang diberikan oleh kerajaan negeri, kerajaan pusat dan syarikat. Ini kerana sebahagian pendapatan kerajaan negeri dan pusat juga adalah dari sumber haram seperti cukai pusat judi, pelaburan haram, riba, pusat hiburan, rumah urut ‘pelacuran' dan sebagainya. Justeru bantuan mungkin sahaja diambil dari wang haram tersebut.


DARI SUDUT HUKUM


Jika dilihat dari sudut hukum, jika tindakan warga emas tersebut dibuat atas dasar kononnya wang dipulang kerana ia tidak bersih dan haram, tindakan mereka adalah SALAH lagi terkeliru dengan cakap-cakap orang yang tiada memahami hukum Islam. Ini kerana dari sudut hukum, faqir dan miskin HARUS menerima sebarang sumbangan yang diberikan oleh pihak kerajaan negeri, walaupun diketahui kerajaan negeri mempunyai sumber wang yang HARAM.


Fakta berikut perlu difahami:


1. Wang kerajaan negeri Pulau Pinang (dan lain-lain tentunya) adalah bercampur.


Para ulama telah membahaskan persoalan penerimaan sumbangan, derma atau menikmati juadah makanan dari individu yang mempunyai pendapatan bercampur antara halal dan haram. Majoriti ulama telah sepakat bahawa selagi mana harta si pemberi itu bercampur selagi itulah kita orang biasa boleh menerima hadiah, sumbangan, derma, menikmati makanan yang disediakan mereka.


Hal yang sama terpakai untuk sesebuah syarikat dan kerajaan, selagi sumber perolehan mereka bercampur, selagi itu HARUS untuk kita menerima gaji atau upah atau apa jua dari kantung mereka, selagi tugas dan cara kita memperolehinya adalah betul. Itu adalah hukum untuk orang biasa, maka jika penerima itu adalah warga yang memerlukan seperti faqir dan miskin, ia sudah tentu jauh lebih jelas KEHARUSANNYA. Malah terdapat dalil yang jelas berkenaan keharusan terbabit. Kes yang sama terpakai untuk kerajaan pusat yang menerima sumber pendapatan dari sumber judi, riba, arak, babi, rumah urut pelacuran dan sebagainya. Selain itu, juga turut menerima sumber halal seperti hasil minyak, jualan komoditi dan sebagainya.


2. Wang itu sendiri tidak najis atau haram pada zatnya.


Wang dan harta hanya dikira haram atau halal pada cara mendapatkannya dan membelanjakannya, ia dinamakan haram dari sudut hukmi bukan ‘hissi'. Ia tidak berpindah dari seorang kepada yang lain. Ia bukan seperti najis yag berpindah apabila disentuh oleh seeorang.


3. Bagaimana jika benar-benar sumbangan dari terus dari kantung wang judi, riba dan rasuah?.


Jika keadaan itu berlaku, ia masih lagi HARUS DITERIMA oleh Faqir, miskin dan digunakan untuk maslahat umum seperti sumbangan warga emas, pembinaan jalanraya, pembersihan dan sebagainya. Itu adalah ijtihad majoriti mazhab silam dan ulama kontemporari. Termasuklah, Majlis Fiqh Antarabangsa OIC, Majlis Fatwa Eropah, Majma Buhuth Mesir[1], Al-Lajnah Al-Daimah, Arab Saudi[2] dan ribuan ulama perseorangan seperti Imam Al-Ghazali, Imam An-Nawawi, Syeikh Al-Qaradawi , Syeikh Az-Zarqa[3], Syeikh Faisal Al-Maulawi dan ramai lagi. Derma bagi wang haram tidak mampu dipulangkan semula kepada tuannya ini hendaklah disedeqahkan kepada orang faqir miskin telah difatwakan harus oleh majoriti mazhab utama Islam (Hasyiah Ibn ‘Abidin, 6/443 ; Fatawa Ibn Rusyd, 1/632 ; Al-Qawaid, Ibn Rejab, hlm 225)


PANDANGAN ULAMA MAZHAB


Ulama hanafi menyebut yang ertinya: Pemilikan kotor (haram) jalan keluarnya adalah disedeqahkannya, malah jika pemilik itu seorang faqir), ia bleh mengambil untuk dirinya sendiri, kemudian, jika selepas itu dia menjadi kaya, hendaklah dia mendermakan wang haram (yang pernah diambilnya sewaktu miskin dahulu) (Al-Ikhtiyar Li Ta'lil al-Mukhtar, 3/61)


Ulama mazhab Maliki seperti Al-Qarafi dan Ad-Dawudi menjelaskan wang haram tidak hanya terhad untuk diberikan kepada faqir dan miskin sahaja tetapi juga apa-apa pembangunan dan kegunaan yang memberi manfaat kepada umum menurut budi bicara dan penilaian pemerintah adil. Jelasnya, mazhab maliki juga setuju faqir, miskin malah warga emas yang memerlukan boleh menerima wang sedemikian tanpa masalah. (rujuk Al-Dzakhirah, 5/69)


Ulama Mazhab Syafie, Imam An-Nawawi menukilkan kata-kata Imam al-Ghazali yang berkata yang ertinya "sekiranya wang haram itu diberikan kepada faqir miskin, ia tidaklah haram ke atas faqir (dan miskin), bahkan ia adalah halal lagi baik untuk mereka." (Al-Majmu' , 9/428)


Imam A-Ghazzali juga menjawab keraguan beberapa ulama lain yang ertinya: "Menjawab kata-kata orang yang berkata : "Kita tidak sepatutnya redha untuk diberikan kepada orang lain sesuatu yang kita tidak redha untuk kita". Memang benar sebegitu, namun dalam kes wang haram yag dimiliki, ia haram ke atas diri kita (pemilik) untuk menggunakannya, namun ia bagi faqir, miskin adalah halal, kerana telah ada dalil syara' yang menghalalkannya dan di ketika wujud kebaikan dari pemberian tersebut (kepada penerima), maka wajiblah diberikan." (Ihya Ulumiddin, 2/212)


Syeikh al-Qaradawi ketika membicara hal pengagihan wang haram berkata yang
ertinya : "Oleh itu, selagi wang haram (yang dimiliki seseorang itu tidak diiktiraf oleh syaraa' sebagai miliknya), harus bagi pemegang itu untuk ambilnya dan disedeqahkan kepada faqir miskin atau didermakan kepada projek-projek kebaikan (untuk maslahat umum). (Fatawa Mu'asiroh, 1/606)


RINGKASAN DALIL


Terdapat banyak sekali dalil yang dijadikan sandaran oleh majoriti ulama, terdiri dari hadis-athar, qiyas dan logik aqal. Antara hujjah yang dipegang bagi mengharuskan ‘derma' wang haram yang tidak diketahui tuannya, cukup sekadar memaklumkan beberapa secara ringkas:-


1. Sayyidina Abu Bakar as-Siddiq r.a pernah bertaruh (di awal Islam) dengan seorang Musyrik (yang mencabar ketepatan Al-Quran dari surah Ar-Rum ayat pertama dan kedua yang mengisyaratkan kejatuhan Rom) iaitu kerajaan Rom akan tewas. Kemudian apabila Rom benar-benar jatuh, Sayyidina Abu Bakar dikira sebagai pemenang dan telah memperolehi harta pertaruhan itu (ianya haram kerana judi dan tujuan Abu Bakar hanyalah untuk membuktikan kebenaran al-Quran). Apabila Sayyidina Abu Bakar datang kepada Rasulullah s.a.w menceritakan perihal harta perolehan pertaruhan itu, Rasulullah bersabda yang ertiya : Ini kotor, sedeqahkan ia. (At-Tirmizi . 16/22 ; At-Tirmizi : Sohih)


Selepas peristiwa ini, barulah turun perintah pengharaman judi secara sepenuhnya sekalipun dengan orang kafir. (Tafsir At-Tabari, 20/16) Kisah ini dengan jelas menunjukkan Nabi tidak mengarahkannya dikembalikan kepada si Kafir, tetapi disedeqahkan untuk tujuan umum dan kebaikan ramai.


2. Selain itu, hujjah utama para ulama dalam hal mendermakan wang haram seperti wang rasuah yang dibawakan oleh Ibn Lutaibah, Nabi meletakkan wang ini di baitul mal dan diagihkan kemudiannya kepada faqir miskin dan kepentingan awam.[4]


3. Terdapat juga athar dari Ibn Mas'ud yang diriwayatkan oleh Al-Bayhaqi 6/188 dan banyak lagi.


KESIMPULAN


* Warga emas, faqir dan miskin di pulau pinang dan mana-mana negeri dan Negara lain, DIHARUSKAN untuk menerima sumbangan dari mana-mana kerajaan negeri, syarikat dan individu selagi mana harta mereka (pemberi sumbangan) itu bercampur antara wang halal dan haram. atau dalam kata lainnya, harta mereka masih ada yang neutral dan halal.


* Sekiranya mereka ingin memulangkan semula wang tersebut, itu juga harus hukumnya. Kerajaan negeri boleh selepas itu memberikan sumbangan dari poket kanan mereka dan wang dipulang itu masuk poket kiri kerajaan. Ia akan jadi sama sebenarnya.


* Sebaiknya penyumbang tidak kira kerajaan, syarikat dan sepertinya; tidak mendedahkan sumber pemerolahan harta yang disumbang agar tidak mengelirukan penerima sebagaimana kes yang berlaku ini.


* Mereka juga HARUS untuk menerima wang sumbangan dari penyumbang tadi, walaupun jelas ia adalah dari hasil yang haram seperti judi lumba kuda rasuah, riba dan sebagainya. Tiada kotor pada wang yang diterima oleh mereka, kerana mereka adalah penerima yang diiktiraf oleh syara'. Manakala dosa hasil dari pemerolehan wang itu hanya ditanggung oleh pelaku dosa dan ia tidak merebak kepada penerima dari kalangan faqir miskin dan yang memerlukan.


* Jika dilihat dari sudut hukum dan agama, warga yang menerima sumbangan terbabit TIDAK PERLU SAMA SEKALI memulangkan semula wang yang diterima.


* Namun jika dilihat dari strategi politik pihak tertentu, tindakan tersebut di luar fokus artikel ini.


Read the well written opinion piece here.


Just hope that our politicians from both sides of the political divide knows what they are getting in to, when they start to use religion to gain votes.

Syukur, Dr Mahathir is out of the hospital and to Mr Lee please get well soon

Good News, Alamdullillah, Praise be to God that Dr Mahathir has recovered well enough to leave the Aussie Hospital where he was warded recently:

Dr Mahathir discharged from Epworth Hospital
(updated)


2010/10/05


KUALA LUMPUR: Former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad was discharged from the Epworth Hospital, Melbourne, Australia at 9am (Malaysian time) today.
According to his special officer, Sufi Yusoff in his e-mail to Bernama, the medical team was happy with Dr Mahathir's rate of progress but he would still be placed under observation for an unspecified period.


"Throughout this period, the medical team will continue to administer antibiotics treatment and physiotherapy as they had been doing since his admission last Saturday for chest infection," he said.


The discharge from the hospital today to a nearby hotel was also part of the rehabilitation process to speed up Dr Mahathir's rate of recovery, Sufi said.


Dr Mahathir is in Melbourne, accompanied by his wife Tun Dr Siti Hasmah Mohd Ali since Thursday and had been expected to address a seminar on human development last Saturday afternoon, organised by the UMNO Club of Melbourne at the University of Melbourne. - Bernama

read more here.

To Singapore Minister Mentor,Lee Kuan Yew, condolences to your recent loss but please get well soon:

Singaporeans Express Concern over Lee’s Kuan Yew’s Health After Death of Wife

Renungan: Semua yang bernyawa pasti akan mati, cuma kita tidak tahu bila masa maut sampai memanggil kita pergi.